And isn't it also the characterization of a society that often brings us to this point??

A witness comes to the stand, claiming to know something very critical to the trial.

No one knows, or for that matter, has ever seen this witness. 

The witness speaks: "Does a righteous person have to be loving?  And does a loving person have to be righteous?"

The court remains silent, as if this lunatic witness before them is not about his wits.

The witness continues: "It is often because of our own shortcomings that we have lack of understanding.  And what we don't understand ...we often judge."

The judge feels it is his job to conduct the courtroom: "What does this have to do with this case before us?"

The witness does not smile, nor is a frown forthcoming: "It has to do with every case brought before us, and this one in particular.  Often what is considered right, is not considered loving.  And what is considered loving is often not seen as right."

Judge: "Please, get to the point ...and I will only allow you a few more moments to show your relevancy."

The witness humbly states: "I guess, we must all attempt to prove our relevancy, including yourself."

The judge orders the witness in contempt of court, and as the witness is escorted out of the courtroom, the witness turns to say one more thing: "And I believe you just proved my previous premise ...that you cannot be both loving and right.  But, one must be truly both ...to be truly either."